Florida Homestead Services - Florida Homestead Exemption Act Forum
Visit our main website at Florida Homestead Services.com
 | Forums | Sign Up | Reply | Search | Statistics |
In the News Florida Homestead Services - Florida Homestead Exemption Act Forum / In the News /  

Side by side comparison of House and Senate property tax proposals

Author johnbsims3
Admin Male

#1 | Posted: 24 Apr 2007 08:50 
We have provided the attached side by side House and Senate property tax proposals. The House and Senate are meeting to make offers to each other and to attempt to resolve disagreements.
side_be_side_prop_ta.pdfAttached file: Side by Side Comparison
 
http://www.floridahomesteadservices.com

Author johnbsims3
Admin Male

#2 | Posted: 24 Apr 2007 13:54 
Well, the gloves started coming off at the noon conference committee meeting. Senator Webster indicated that he believed the idea of a sales tax was dead. He did indicate that the Senate was willing to work thru a rollback and was using the House's HB 7001 as a base to work from. My judgment is that this is not good news. Keep in mind schools and special districts will not be affected by any roll back at this point. Both Chambers agree on that. What we will be left with is a direct roll back on ad valorem based revenue. Expansion of tax breaks for first time home buyers, affordable housing are going to be in a plan if they can agree. Also the 25K intangible personal property credit will be in as well. The chambers are not getting along very well. They will meet again at 6 Pm this evening.
http://www.floridahomesteadservices.com

Author johnbsims3
Admin Male

#3 | Posted: 24 Apr 2007 13:56 
Politics
Tax relief plans far apart
State lawmakers have two weeks to meld House and Senate plans. There is no script.
By ALEX LEARY
Published April 23, 2007

TALLAHASSEE - The conventional wisdom on this week's showdown over statewide tax relief goes like this:
The unified Senate, with its targeted cuts and its unanimous vote, has the edge over the party-split House and its meat-cleaver proposal.
Don't be so sure.
The final act of the tax cut debate that opens this week between the chambers is something of a rarity in Tallahassee: It's a play that seems to have no script. The Senate plan is so different from the House version it's hard to see how they arrive at a single proposal to send Gov. Charlie Crist.
But maybe that's not true, either.
What happens over the next two weeks - or beyond if a special session is required - is of great significance to Floridians. Tax bills are going to change and it's likely the services of local government will, too.
Here's a look at the political dynamics for this debate. THE SENATE STORY: The Senate made it seem easy, dignified. After weeks of careful study, lawmakers came through on a promise of broad property tax relief. Without debate, the plan passed unanimously on Thursday.
"In eight minutes, we cut taxes by $12-billion. Just think of what we could have done in eight hours," teased Sen. Mike Fasano, who bumped into a House colleague on the street recently.
"Well, you guys are the wiser chamber," Rep. Dean Cannon shot back.
Kidding aside, many agree the Senate's united front provides the upper hand in negotiations.
"It's psychological, nothing you can put your hands on, but it will work on the House members," said Curt Kiser, a former Republican legislator from Pinellas County. "There's that old saying about a House divided."
But for every point, there's a counterpoint. The Senate's plan went down so easily some don't trust it, mainly because it would not save the average taxpayer nearly as much as the House plan would.
All those weeks of public flogging of the House's bold proposals made it a target for some, but it also may have whet the appetite of many taxpayers for something big.
Senate President Ken Pruitt has gotten an e-mail box full of reviews of his modest plan.
"As a lifelong Republican, I am disgusted with you and 'our' Republican Senate," Jack Loos of Fort Lauderdale wrote in an e-mail. "You should be trying to enact meaningful property tax relief, not trying to undermine it."
Here's what the Senate plan would do:
It would roll back property tax revenues for cities and counties to 2005 levels, where they would freeze for one year. After that, budgets could grow with the population.
It would give the popular concept of Save Our Homes what is called "portability." Longtime homeowners complain that they feel trapped in their homes because moving would mean losing the 3 percent cap on annual assessments and much higher tax bills, even if they go to a smaller home.
Portability alleviates that problem. But the Senate calls for increasing the 3 percent cap to 10 percent for several years.
Another part of the Senate plan is a $50,000 homestead exemption to first-time home buyers. It applies to homes worth at least $100,000, and the exemption would drop to the standard $25,000 once Save Our Homes kicked in.
The Senate also exempts the first $25,000 of business equipment from a tax on tangible property.
The House story
Under House Speaker Marco Rubio, the chamber announced its plan even before the session began, then tweaked it several times along the way.
Its centerpiece - and source of much controversy - is a plan to abolish all taxes on primary homes in exchange for a 2.5 percent sales tax increase.
Democrats, newspaper editorial writers and others have swiftly and loudly criticized the plan, saying it pushes a greater burden to nonhomestead property owners and disproportionately hurts the poor, who pay more of their income in sales taxes.
Some Republicans are squeamish, too, terrified of a plan that would require raising taxes by $9-billion to eliminate taxes for primary homeowners only.
"That's not what my seniors want me to do, that's not what my young families want me to do," said Sen. Fasano, R-New Port Richey. "Millionaires would enjoy not having to pay property tax and they can afford the extra 2.5 cents."
But Rubio has tirelessly promoted his plan, holding campaign-style conference calls and dispatching rank-and-file Republicans to host workshops around the state.
Despite the threat of a large defection on voting day, only two Republicans crossed party lines, and three Democrats were on Rubio's side.
Rubio, the charismatic 35-year-old from Miami, is still working the case. He will be the featured speaker at a tax cut rally in Tallahassee Tuesday.
Harmony after all?
Huge gaps remain between the competing plans, but they suddenly looked a lot closer on Friday when a House committee passed a bill that would provide Save Our Homes portability.
The bill was going nowhere because Rubio's plan to swap property taxes on homesteads for more sales tax made portability a moot issue.
House leaders insist they're just keeping options open, but the sudden move on portability suggests they might be willing to drop the big, bold tax swap.
If portability is in the mix on the House side, suddenly the House and Senate plans have a few things in common. Both would roll back tax rates for local government, and both would cap government budgets.
If the House really is willing to back off the tax swap idea - and the higher sales tax idea - the next two weeks could be about compromising over the details. - Portability. The House's newly passed plan calls for a straight transfer of any accrued benefit, while the Senate limits to $500,000 of home value and increases the cap 10 percent on assessments for several years. - Rollback. The House has two plans, one that would roll back government budgets to 2001 levels and another to 2003. The Senate rollback is to 2005.
A number of senators have said they could live with a rollback that goes back further, and the House seems ready to consider not gong back so far. It's not hard to imagine a split-the-difference deal rolling tax rates back to 2004.
As for the rest?
"We're not drawing a line in the sand," said Sen. Jim King, R-Jacksonville. "Everything of theirs will be considered over here, and we hope everything of ours will be considered over there."
Times capital bureau chief Steve Bousquet contributed to this report.
http://www.floridahomesteadservices.com

Author johnbsims3
Admin Male

#4 | Posted: 24 Apr 2007 13:56 
House group backs homestead portability bill
By Michael C. Bender
Palm Beach Post Capital Bureau
Saturday, April 21, 2007
TALLAHASSEE Property owners could move some Save Our Homes benefits from one homestead to another under a bill that received broad support Friday from a powerful House council.
"This eliminates the disincentive to move," said Rep. Carl Domino, R-Jupiter.

Domino has tried to make Save Our Homes benefits portable for the past four years and finally got his day Friday, when the measure received broad support from the House Policy and Budget Council.
The only opposition on the 33-member council was from Rep. Curtis Richardson, D-Tallahassee, who questioned the effect the bill could have on the state's smaller, rural counties.
The positive vote was a significant departure from the sharp focus of House Republican leaders so far this session. They've concentrated instead on House Speaker Marco Rubio's plan to eliminate property taxes on primary homes, known as homesteads, and replace that lost revenue with an increase in the state sales tax.
Eliminating taxes on homesteads, they say, would also eliminate any hesitation to move to a new home caused by Save Our Homes, a voter-approved constitutional amendment that caps annual increases in the value of homesteads to the rate of inflation or 3 percent, whichever is less. The savings that a homeowner accumulates from the amendment is not currently transferable when someone sells one homestead and buys another.
A debate on portability in the House was unlikely until this week, when Domino agreed to vote for Rubio's tax swap on the House floor in return for a debate on one of Domino's top priorities.
"I got what I wanted," Domino said after the vote Wednesday on Rubio's plan.
When asked about the recent interest in portability in the House, Rubio pointed to the Senate tax reform package, which does not include his tax swap but would make Save Our Homes portable.
"We want to make sure one of our committees at least has a hearing on it and the House has some level of procedural work on it," said Rubio, R-West Miami.
Portability of Save Our Homes has become an issue in recent years as the market values of homes have raced far beyond taxable-value assessments based on the 3 percent cap. The gap between assessed value and market value has created thousands of dollars in tax savings for homestead property owners.
But many homeowners say that gap also has prevented them from moving to a new dwelling, because they can't transfer it to a new homestead.
The House portability bill (PCB 07-09) would let homestead owners move the accrued savings. The amount that can be transferred, however, is limited to the amount that would reduce the assessed value of the new property to no less than the assessed value of the old property.
For example, if the owner of a $500,000 home is paying taxes based on a $300,000 assessment, the entire $200,000 in assessment savings could be transferred only to a new home worth $500,000 or more.
If that same homeowner moved to a dwelling that was worth $400,000, his portable savings would be $100,000, or the difference between the market value of the new home and the assessment of the old one.
There would be no portable savings if that same homeowner moved to a house worth $250,000, because the new house would be worth less than the old assessment.
The Senate portability plan is more limited. First, it would cap the amount of savings one could transfer at $500,000.
Secondly, it would allow the assessment value of the new home (the sales price minus the savings transfer) to increase by as much as 10 percent a year until that value equals what the home without the savings transfer would have been worth under the Save Our Homes assessment cap of 3 percent or less. At that point, the regular Save Our Homes assessment cap would kick back in.
Using that Senate formula, a homeowner with $200,000 in Save Our Homes savings who buys a new home valued at $500,000 would get eight years of tax savings.
Richardson questioned the House plan Friday, saying it could drain rural government coffers if South Florida homeowners port their savings to North Florida.
But Domino dismissed the idea, saying the cap would invigorate the real estate market and encourage developers to build more homes in North Florida.
http://www.floridahomesteadservices.com

In the News Florida Homestead Services - Florida Homestead Exemption Act Forum / In the News /
Side by side comparison of House and Senate property tax proposals
Top
Your Reply Click this icon to move up to the quoted message
 

 ?
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please, enter your username/password details upon posting a message, or register first.
 
  Powered by Forum Software miniBB®